US Doctrine Keeps Lebanese Military Underfunded and Weak

US military policy, tied to Israel's interests, hampers Lebanese defense capabilities. The international call for disarmament of Hezbollah contrasts with ongoing U.S. support for Israel's qualitative military edge.

As Lebanon commemorates one month since the tragic events known as "Black Wednesday," where Israeli forces conducted extensive strikes resulting in 361 casualties, significant scrutiny falls on the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF). The international community is increasingly urging Lebanon to disarm Hezbollah, viewed as a major impediment to national stability and regional peace. Notably, the U.S., which has a vested interest in maintaining Israel's military superiority, simultaneously limits the funding and resources available to the LAF.

The doctrine adopted by the U.S. is largely focused on ensuring Israel retains a qualitative military edge (QME) over its neighbors. This strategic stance, rooted in U.S. foreign policy, has resulted in Lebanon's military forces receiving inadequate support. While the U.S. advocates for a stronger Lebanese army to counterbalance Hezbollah's influence, its actions counteract this goal due to consistent underfunding and lack of advanced military equipment.

Strategically, this prolonged underdevelopment of the Lebanese military serves Israel's interests. A weakened Lebanese army is less capable of engaging in any military or defense initiatives that could challenge Israeli actions. This dynamic complicates the already volatile landscape of the Middle East, potentially perpetuating the cycle of violence and instability.

Regarding operational capabilities, the Lebanese Armed Forces remain significantly behind their regional counterparts in terms of equipment and training. Reports indicate that the LAF lacks modern weaponry and sufficient operational budgets necessary to safeguard Lebanon's sovereignty effectively. Current military hardware such as infantry equipment and logistical resources are outdated compared to even nearby nations.

Looking forward, the implications of this military doctrine could be severe. Both the U.S. and Israel may face blowback from regional discontent towards perceived suppression of Lebanon's defense capabilities. Additionally, the continuing empowerment of non-state actors like Hezbollah poses a long-term threat not only to Lebanon but also to broader regional security, potentially leading to increased tensions and conflicts across the Levant.